Re: [PATCH] hwmon (ina3221) Add single-shot mode support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/19/18 2:18 PM, Nicolin Chen wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 09:45:59AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
In short, other than exposing it via a generic ABI to the user
space, how about defining some policy to maintaining it within
the driver?

I think that would be a bad idea. It changes timing for everyone
curently using the driver. It also effectively disables monitoring,
which is the main purpose for using this chip (and other hardware
monitoring chips). This is indeed a key difference between iio
and hwmon - the main purpose of chips in the iio subsystem is to
be able report data efficiently to user space, not hardware monitoring.
I do not think it is appropriate to use iio requirements as argument
to change hwmon driver behavior (and vice versa).

OK...what about setting a default mode via DT? I didn't expect it
to be possible until I found this existing solution. Though it is
still in an iio driver, I don't think this should be iio specific.

   commit 023e30fb0d3a3b9d6b8dc9e47590aa544d58a22f
   Author: Adriana Reus <adriana.reus@xxxxxxxxx>
   Date:   Tue Nov 24 12:59:49 2015 +0200

     Documentation: devicetree: Add property for controlling power saving
                    mode for the us5182 als sensor

     Add a property to allow changing the default power-saving mode.
     By default, at read raw the chip will activate and provide
     one measurent, then it will shut itself down. However, the
     chip can also work in "continuous" mode which may be more reliable
     but is also more power consuming.

     Signed-off-by: Adriana Reus <adriana.reus@xxxxxxxxx>
     Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
     Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>

Would it be possible for me to apply a similar one? Since hwmon
driver uses continuous mode by default, I will add a "one-shot"
property instead of "continuous" -- all existing users won't be
effected unless they place one-shot properties in DT bindings.


I would accept such a patch, but it would for all practical purposes
disable the monitoring of limits. Make sure that is well documented.

Guenter



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux