On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 17:48, Lukasz Luba <l.luba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Krzysztof, > > On 10/16/2018 05:09 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 16:56, Lukasz Luba <l.luba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > > > > Hi Lukasz, > > > > Thanks for patches. > > > > I did not receive the first patches in the series. It is okay (depends > > on the context) but in such case sending cover letter to all people is > > quite useful. It helps to understand the entire patchset. Since I did > > not get them, I really do not know: > > 1. Whether DTS patches are independent? > > 2. How this fits in the big picture of Exynos thermal? > I have lost your email for my 'cc' command line, my apologies. > I will add you in v2. > Here you can find the cover letter: > https://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=153970180314648&w=2 > regarding > 1. they are independent > 2. It will be less confusing and more coherent with documentation > when we use 'passive' for DVFS cooling. Unfortunately, when 'passive' > is set, it registers our trip points for polling and thermal schedules > the work. I had conversation with Daniel regarding this setup, > please check these email: > https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=153924620318766&w=2 > and my response: > https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=153933708316168&w=2 I see it on the linux-pm, I'll reply there. Best regards, Krzysztof
