On 09/24/2018 05:18 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> For a while now, the LSM core has said it was "initializED", rather than
> "initializING". This adjust the report to be more accurate (i.e. before
> this was reported before any LSMs had been initialized.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> security/security.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index 736e78da1ab9..4cbcf244a965 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -72,10 +72,11 @@ int __init security_init(void)
> int i;
> struct hlist_head *list = (struct hlist_head *) &security_hook_heads;
>
> + pr_info("Security Framework initializing\n");
> +
> for (i = 0; i < sizeof(security_hook_heads) / sizeof(struct hlist_head);
> i++)
> INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&list[i]);
> - pr_info("Security Framework initialized\n");
>
> /*
> * Load minor LSMs, with the capability module always first.
>
