On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 13:12 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:47:57PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > Perhaps it's better to stick to a single SPDX version style for > > all kernel files. > > > > Right now, there are already several -only and -or-later uses. > > > > $ git grep -P 'SPDX-License-Identifier.*(?:-or-later|-only)'| wc -l > > 144 > > > > So perhaps a patch and a tool to do the reverse conversion: > > No. Any tool which does anything useful just has to understand both > 2.0 and 3.0 naming. They're aliases for each other, that's all. But that same tool would have to be updated if ever yet-another spdx version appears. So it'd probably be better to support just 1 version.
