On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 13:22 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 01:21:30PM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > > Checkpatch.pl should probably exclude *.rst files from the SPDX > > License > > Identifier check, since they are documentational files, like > > *.txt. > > They're still copyrighted work, so they should still have SPDX tags > to identify their license. > > checkpatch has: > > } elsif ($realfile =~ /\.rst$/) { > $comment = '..'; > > so we're explicitly including rst files in the checking for now. Ah, sorry. I did not catch that they started to include SPDX-License- Identifiers for RST files, thanks Matthew.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part