Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] Add the I3C subsystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 11:57:56 +0200
Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> Maybe a bit-bang I3C master isn't feasible for some fundamental
> reason?

No, it's clearly not. The way an I3C master is supposed to switch from
open-drain to push-pull during a transaction or the concept of IBIs
are the first things that come to mind, but I guess you have plenty of
other reasons preventing you from implementing a i3c-bit-bang master.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux