On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 12:12:28 -0400 Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The rationale beside this patchset comes from a customer request to have > the ability to track and limit negative dentries. Please go back to customer and ask them "why", then let us know. Could I suggest you stop working on implementation things and instead work on preparing a comprehensive bug report? Describe the workload, describe the system behavior, describe why it is problematic, describe the preferred behavior, etc. Once we have that understanding, it might be that we eventually agree that the problem is unfixable using existing memory management techniques and that it is indeed appropriate that we add a lot more code which essentially duplicates kswapd functionality and which essentially duplicates direct reclaim functionality. But I sure hope not. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
