On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 11:44 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 03:26:30PM -0700, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> >
> > WRUSS is a new kernel-mode instruction but writes directly
> > to user shadow stack memory. This is used to construct
> > a return address on the shadow stack for the signal
> > handler.
> >
> > This instruction can fault if the user shadow stack is
> > invalid shadow stack memory. In that case, the kernel does
> > fixup.
> >
> >
> > +static inline int write_user_shstk_64(unsigned long addr, unsigned
> > long val)
> > +{
> > + int err = 0;
> > +
> > + asm volatile("1: wrussq %[val], (%[addr])\n"
> > + "xor %[err], %[err]\n"
> this XOR is superfluous, you already cleared @err above.
I will fix it.
>
> >
> > + "2:\n"
> > + ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n"
> > + "3: mov $-1, %[err]; jmp 2b\n"
> > + ".previous\n"
> > + _ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 3b)
> > + : [err] "=a" (err)
> > + : [val] "S" (val), [addr] "D" (addr));
> > +
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_X86_INTEL_CET */
> > +
> > #define nop() asm volatile ("nop")
> What happened to:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1528729376.4526.0.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yes, I put that in once and realized we only need to skip the
instruction and return err. Do you think we still need a handler for
that?
Yu-cheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
