> > + * smp_mb__after_spinlock() provides a full memory barrier between po-earlier > > + * lock acquisitions and po-later memory accesses. > > How about saying "provides the equivalent of a full memory barrier"? > > The point being that smp_mb__after_spinlock doesn't have to provide an > actual barrier; it just has to ensure the behavior is the same as if a > full barrier were present. Agreed; will fix in the next version. Thanks, Andrea > > Alan > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
