Re: [PATCH 0/4] docs: e100[0] fix build errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 01:11:33AM +0000, Kirsher, Jeffrey T wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Jun 24, 2018, at 16:41, Tobin C. Harding <me@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> >> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 01:22:37PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> Hi Tobin,
> >> 
> >>> On 06/21/2018 05:37 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> >>> Hi Jonathan,
> >>> 
> >>> This patch set fixes current docs build failure on Linus' mainline
> >>> 
> >>> commit: (ba4dbdedd3ed Merge tag 'jfs-4.18' of git://github.com/kleikamp/linux-shaggy)
> >>> 
> >>> (FYI this is 8 commits after Linux 4.18-rc1).
> >>> 
> >>> And also same build errors on today's linux-next
> >>> 
> >>> 8439c34f07a3 (tag: next-20180621, linux-next/master, linux-next) Add linux-next specific files for 20180621
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> I split the patches in between the two drivers to enable use of the
> >>> 'Fixes:' tag.
> >>> 
> >>> Tobin C. Harding (4):
> >>>  Documentation: e100: Use correct heading adornment
> >>>  Documentation: e1000: Use correct heading adornment
> >>>  Documentation: e100: Fix docs build error
> >>>  Documentation: e1000: Fix docs build error
> >>> 
> >>> Documentation/networking/e100.rst  | 112 +++++++++++++++--------------
> >>> Documentation/networking/e1000.rst |  76 ++++++++++----------
> >>> 2 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> I am still seeing a few warnings (your 4 patches applied to
> >> linux-next-20180622):
> >> 
> >> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e100.rst:57: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
> >> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e100.rst:68: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
> >> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e100.rst:75: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
> >> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e100.rst:84: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
> >> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e100.rst:93: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
> >> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e1000.rst:83: ERROR: Unexpected indentation.
> >> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e1000.rst:84: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> >> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e1000.rst:173: WARNING: Definition list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> >> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e1000.rst:236: WARNING: Definition list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> You didn't get these warnings?  or they weren't important?
> >> or "perfect" was not your primary goal?   :)   [which is fine]
> >> 
> >> [I see around 50 similar doc formatting warnings/errors in the entire
> >> Documentation build.]
> > 
> > Thanks for testing this Randy.  You are right there are a bunch of
> > warnings, I did not think to grep for warnings on these files - sloppy
> > work by me.  The series has been applied already but I'll add clearing
> > these warnings to my TODO list.
> 
> Thanks, already on it.  I have a set of patches that I will push once Dave open’s up his net-next tree.

Oh cool, even better.

thanks,
Tobin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux