On 06/07/2018 01:12 PM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
>>> +int cet_restore_signal(unsigned long ssp)
>>> +{
>>> + if (!current->thread.cet.shstk_enabled)
>>> + return 0;
>>> + return cet_set_shstk_ptr(ssp);
>>> +}
>> This will blow up if the shadow stack enabled state changes in a
>> signal handler. Maybe we don't care.
> Yes, the task will get a control protection fault.
Sounds like something to add to the very long list of things that are
unwise to do in a signal handler. Great manpage fodder.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
