On 2018-06-01 03:44 PM, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Michel Dänzer <michel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 2018-06-01 02:58 PM, Alex Deucher wrote: >>> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Michel Dänzer <michel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx> >>> >>> Series is: >>> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> >> >> Thanks. Is it okay to merge all of these via the amdgpu tree, or should >> I wait for an ack from Jon and/or core DRM maintainers for that? > > GPU documentation usually goes through the drm trees. You might want > to push patch 1 (drm_mm.rst fix) via drm_misc, but the rest are can go > in via the amdgpu tree since they are amdgpu specific. I'd prefer merging all three patches together, since without patch 1, patch 3 generates the warning below while generating documentation, and the reference to the PRIME Buffer Sharing section doesn't work. .../linux/Documentation/gpu/amdgpu.rst:2: WARNING: undefined label: prime_buffer_sharing (if the link has no caption the label must precede a section header) -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
