Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] powerpc: use task_pid_nr() for TID allocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/05/18 16:12, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@xxxxxxxxxxx>

The current implementation of TID allocation, using a global IDR, may
result in an errant process starving the system of available TIDs.
Instead, use task_pid_nr(), as mentioned by the original author. The
scenario described which prevented it's use is not applicable, as
set_thread_tidr can only be called after the task struct has been
populated.

In the unlikely event that 2 threads share the TID and are waiting,
all potential outcomes have been determined safe.

Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for the clarifying comment. The diff is painful to read but I think it makes sense :)

Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@xxxxxxxxxxx>

--
Andrew Donnellan              OzLabs, ADL Canberra
andrew.donnellan@xxxxxxxxxxx  IBM Australia Limited

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux