Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: remove odd HAVE_PTE_SPECIAL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Le 11/04/2018 à 10:41, Laurent Dufour a écrit :
On 11/04/2018 10:33, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Wed 11-04-18 10:03:36, Laurent Dufour wrote:
@@ -881,7 +876,8 @@ struct page *_vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
if (is_zero_pfn(pfn))
  		return NULL;
-check_pfn:
+
+check_pfn: __maybe_unused
  	if (unlikely(pfn > highest_memmap_pfn)) {
  		print_bad_pte(vma, addr, pte, NULL);
  		return NULL;
@@ -891,7 +887,7 @@ struct page *_vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
  	 * NOTE! We still have PageReserved() pages in the page tables.
  	 * eg. VDSO mappings can cause them to exist.
  	 */
-out:
+out: __maybe_unused
  	return pfn_to_page(pfn);

Why do we need this ugliness all of the sudden?
Indeed the compiler doesn't complaint but in theory it should since these
labels are not used depending on CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL.

Why should it complain ?

Regards
Christophe


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux