On 28/03/2018 17:01, Paul Cercueil wrote: > Le 2018-03-18 23:13, Daniel Lezcano a écrit : >> On 18/03/2018 00:28, Paul Cercueil wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> This is the 4th version of my TCU patchset. >>> >>> The major change is a greatly improved documentation, both in-code >>> and as separate text files, to describe how the hardware works and >>> how the devicetree bindings should be used. >>> >>> There are also cosmetic changes in the irqchip driver, and the >>> clocksource driver will now use as timers all TCU channels not >>> requested by the TCU PWM driver. >> >> Hi Paul, >> >> I don't know why but you series appears in reply to [PATCH v3 2/9]. Not >> sure if it is my mailer or how you are sending the patches but if it is >> the latter can you in the future, when resending a new version, not use >> the in-reply-to option. It will be easier to follow the versions. >> >> Thanks. >> >> -- Daniel > > Hi Daniel, > > I guess I did a mistake. I always reply to the first patch of the previous > version of the patchset (is that correct?). It depends, if you have a threaded view of emails, it is not easy to review the patches when they are in several levels. Usually you can see the patches is top posted without in-reply-to every version. You can use in-reply-to to an email suggesting a change in order to give context. For the v4 series of these drivers, I'm lost :/ -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
