On 二, 2018-03-20 at 09:38 +0800, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 14-03-18, 13:44, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > > I got those warnings as well, and I quietly ignored them :) > > > > I ignored the renaming part for the sake of consistency. The other > > existing > > routines for similar purpose are named as: > > > > thermal_cooling_device_type_show > > thermal_cooling_device_max_state_show > > thermal_cooling_device_cur_state_show > > thermal_cooling_device_cur_state_store > > > > for me it made more sense to follow that naming convention. And I > > didn't use the > > _RO and _WO variants for the same reason. > > > > Now here is what I propose now: > > > > - You apply this patch as-is and ignore the warning. > > > > - I will send few patches on top of that to do: > > - renaming of all such routines to shorter versions. > > - Use the _RO or _WO variants of the macro everywhere. > > > > What do you say ? > @Zhang: Can you please share the way you want this to get merged ? > And if the > above is fine with you ? > yes, it works for me. I will apply the patch later today. thanks, rui -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
