Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] sysctl: Add flags to support min/max range clamping

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/16/2018 09:10 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 02:13:42PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> When the CTL_FLAGS_CLAMP_RANGE flag is set in the ctl_table
>> entry, any update from the userspace will be clamped to the given
>> range without error if either the proc_dointvec_minmax() or the
>> proc_douintvec_minmax() handlers is used.
> I don't get it.  Why define a generic range flag when we can be mores specific and
> you do that in your next patch. What's the point of this flag then?
>
>   Luis

I was thinking about using the signed/unsigned bits as just annotations
for ranges for future extension. For the purpose of this patchset alone,
I can merge the three bits into just two.

Cheers,
Longman


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux