[PATCH 6/6] drm: intel_dpio_phy: fix kernel-doc comments at nested struct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The in-lined comments for channel.port doesn't follow the syntax
described at kernel-doc document, causing the following warning:

	$ ./scripts/kernel-doc -none drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c
	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c:154: warning: Function parameter or member 'channel.port' not described in 'bxt_ddi_phy_info'

While the best would be for the Kernel to deduce that from the
context, supporting it is not trivial. So, let's just stick with
the existing syntax.

Reported-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c
index 76473e9836c6..c8e9e44e5981 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ struct bxt_ddi_phy_info {
 	 */
 	struct {
 		/**
-		 * @port: which port maps to this channel.
+		 * @channel.port: which port maps to this channel.
 		 */
 		enum port port;
 	} channel[2];
-- 
2.14.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux