[RESEND PATCH] memory-barriers: Fix description of data dependency barriers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In the description of data dependency barriers the words 'before' is
used erroneously. Since such barrier order dependent loads one after
the other. So substitute 'before' with 'after'.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>
---

Resent due to missing out the various mailing lists doh ... 


 Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index a863009849a3..0d696c7fd97a 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ VARIETIES OF MEMORY BARRIER
      where two loads are performed such that the second depends on the result
      of the first (eg: the first load retrieves the address to which the second
      load will be directed), a data dependency barrier would be required to
-     make sure that the target of the second load is updated before the address
+     make sure that the target of the second load is updated after the address
      obtained by the first load is accessed.
 
      A data dependency barrier is a partial ordering on interdependent loads
-- 
2.7.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux