On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 10:46 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:00:17PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > Today when we run checkers we get so many warnings it is too hard to > > > make any sense of it. > > > > Here is a list of the checkpatch messages for drivers/infiniband > > sorted by type. > > > > Many of these might be corrected by using > > > > $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -f --fix-inplace --types=<TYPE> \ > > $(git ls-files drivers/infiniband/) > > How many of these do you think it is worth to fix? > > We do get a steady trickle of changes in this topic every cycle. > > Is it better to just do a big number of them all at once? I think so. > Do you have > an idea how disruptive this kind of work is to the whole patch flow > eg new patches no longer applying to for-next, backports no longer > applying, merge conflicts? Some do complain about backport patch purity. I think that difficulty is overstated, but then again, I don't do backports very often. I think the best time for any rather wholesale change is immediately after an rc-1 so overall in-flight patch conflict volume is minimized. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
