It thinks we want to document the __printf(2,0) annotion. Not sure we
want to teach it about all possible gcc-only flags, hence why I opted
for the cheap trick of just moving it ahead of the kerneldoc.
This is only a problem for static inline functions, since for
non-inline function the kerneldoc is in the .c file, but the special
annotations are all in the header.
Cc'ing kernel-doc maintainers as fyi.
Cc: linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
---
include/drm/drm_print.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_print.h b/include/drm/drm_print.h
index 5f9932e2246e..2a4a42e59a47 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_print.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_print.h
@@ -80,13 +80,13 @@ void __drm_printfn_debug(struct drm_printer *p, struct va_format *vaf);
__printf(2, 3)
void drm_printf(struct drm_printer *p, const char *f, ...);
+__printf(2, 0)
/**
* drm_vprintf - print to a &drm_printer stream
* @p: the &drm_printer
* @fmt: format string
* @va: the va_list
*/
-__printf(2, 0)
static inline void
drm_vprintf(struct drm_printer *p, const char *fmt, va_list *va)
{
--
2.15.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
