On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 12:46:35 +0200 > Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Some functions from refcount_t API provide different >> memory ordering guarantees that their atomic counterparts. >> This adds a document outlining these differences ( >> Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst) as well as >> some other minor improvements. > > I've applied this, thanks, it looks good. > > One thing I noticed, though, is that this landed in the core-api manual, > while the refcount_t documentation is in the driver-api manual. The > cross-references work just fine and such, but this still doesn't seem quite > right. Probably what should be done is to have all the refcount_t > material in core-api; I may do that if I get a moment. I did notice that, yeah. It seemed like a bunch of kernel-doc was living in the driver-api manual, where it should be in core. Since atomics were already there, I put refcount_t there... -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
