On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 3:48 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 06:18:45PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: >> On Sat, 2017-12-09 at 12:27 +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote: >> > On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 01:22:37PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: >> >> > > Outside of the documentation, what could be useful is for >> > > someone to add a tool to verify %p<foo> extension to >> > > the typeof address actually passed as an argument. >> > >> > This sounds interesting to work no. At first glance I have no idea how >> > one would go about this. Some form of static analysis would be a good >> > place to start, right? I'd like to allocate some cycles to this, any >> > pointers most appreciated. >> >> A gcc-plugin would likely work best. >> >> There was some discussion about such a thing here: >> http://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2017/02/14/38 >> >> I vaguely recall someone else doing a broader use tool >> which I believe was not smatch, but my google-fu isn't >> finding it. > > Yeah. Smatch has a check for this. Rasmus Villemoes wrote it. There's been some other work on format strings by Rasmus too. Thread is here, which I still haven't caught back up on: http://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2017/11/08/25 -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
