Re: [PATCH v9 44/51] selftest/vm: powerpc implementation for generic abstraction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ram,

On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 03:37:46PM -0800, Ram Pai wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 04:47:15PM -0200, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 12:57:36AM -0800, Ram Pai wrote:
> > > @@ -206,12 +209,14 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *vucontext)
> > >  
> > >  	trapno = uctxt->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_TRAPNO];
> > >  	ip = uctxt->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_IP_IDX];
> > > -	fpregset = uctxt->uc_mcontext.fpregs;
> > > -	fpregs = (void *)fpregset;
> > 
> > Since you removed all references for fpregset now, you probably want to
> > remove the declaration of the variable above.
> 
> fpregs is still needed.

Right, fpregs is still needed, but not fpregset. Every reference for this
variable was removed with your patch.

Grepping this variable identifier on a tree with your patches, I see:

 $ grep fpregset protection_keys.c 
 fpregset_t fpregset;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux