Hi Ram, On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 03:37:46PM -0800, Ram Pai wrote: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 04:47:15PM -0200, Breno Leitao wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 12:57:36AM -0800, Ram Pai wrote: > > > @@ -206,12 +209,14 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *vucontext) > > > > > > trapno = uctxt->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_TRAPNO]; > > > ip = uctxt->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_IP_IDX]; > > > - fpregset = uctxt->uc_mcontext.fpregs; > > > - fpregs = (void *)fpregset; > > > > Since you removed all references for fpregset now, you probably want to > > remove the declaration of the variable above. > > fpregs is still needed. Right, fpregs is still needed, but not fpregset. Every reference for this variable was removed with your patch. Grepping this variable identifier on a tree with your patches, I see: $ grep fpregset protection_keys.c fpregset_t fpregset; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
