On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Make the intel-lpss driver set DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND for its > >> devices which will allow them to stay in runtime suspend during > >> system suspend unless they need to be reconfigured for some reason. > >> > >> Also make it avoid resuming its child devices if they have > >> DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND set to allow them to remain in runtime > >> suspend during system suspend. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c | 6 +++++- > >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > Is this patch independent? > > It depends on the flag definition at least, but functionally it also > depends on the PCI support for the flag. No problem. Which tree to you propose this goes through? > > For my own reference: > > Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
