Hello Peter, On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:13:45AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 05:44:27PM -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > > @@ -46,6 +48,8 @@ static inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock) > > if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR)) > > return false; > > > > + if (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_DEDICATED)) > > + return false; > > /* > > * On hypervisors without PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS support we fall > > * back to a Test-and-Set spinlock, because fair locks have > > This does not apply. Much has been changed here recently. > I checked against Linus master branch before sending. Which tree/branch are you referring to / should I based this? -- All the best, Eduardo Valentin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
