Re: [PATCH 1/3] printk: Introduce per-console loglevel setting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu 2017-10-19 16:40:45, Calvin Owens wrote:
> On 09/28/2017 05:43 PM, Calvin Owens wrote:
> >Not all consoles are created equal: depending on the actual hardware,
> >the latency of a printk() call can vary dramatically. The worst examples
> >are serial consoles, where it can spin for tens of milliseconds banging
> >the UART to emit a message, which can cause application-level problems
> >when the kernel spews onto the console.
> 
> Any thoughts on this series? Happy to resend again, but if there are no
> objections I'd love to see it merged sooner rather than later :)
> 
> Happy to resend too, just let me know.

There is no need to resend the patch. It is on my radar and I am
going to look at it.

Please, be patient, you hit conference, illness, after vacation
season. We do not want to unnecessarily delay it but it is
not a trivial change that might be accepted within minutes.

Best Regards,
Petr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux