On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:03:40AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:26:19 -0700 > "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > OK, how about if I submit them to the 4.15 merge window, but add the > > appropriate -stable tags to get them backported? Yes, these are bugs, > > but I cannot in good conscience claim that they are v4.14 regressions. > > > > But if Jon agrees with you, I will of course create a patch series, > > pull request, or whatever and send it along to him. > > [Sorry for being slow ... $EXCUSES ... ] > > One could argue that they are indeed a regression; they introduced a bunch > of build errors into 4.14. I think it would be better to see it fixed if > possible. I don't care that much about how it gets there; Paul, I can > send it Linusward if you don't want to. I never have pushed directly to Linus, so I might as well get started doing so. On a related topic... Is there anything that test-builds docbook prior to patches hitting mainline? My experience indicates that the answer is "no". Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
