On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 11:10:38AM +0200, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Way back in 2008 we didn't have "robust" in-kernel documentation system, > so the idea of putting something like the kernel driver statement in the > kernel tree wasn't even imagined. But now that has changed, so add the > old document to the kernel source itself to allow for us to properly > reference it in one canonical place (as the LF wiki keeps moving things > around.) Cool, I like it much to see it added to the kernel tree. But could you explain what "robust" means in this context? And what has changed which makes it "robust"? Sphinx? I am interested in how such documents are handled best.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
