Em Fri, 6 Oct 2017 14:51:06 +0300 Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxx> escreveu: > Hi Mauro, > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 01:22:29PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > > + V4L2 device node > > > + A device node that is associated to a V4L2 main driver, > > > + as specified in :ref:`v4l2_device_naming`. > > I think we need to name the interface, not so much their instances. > > How about adding: > > V4L2 > Video4Linux 2 interface. The interface implemented by **V4L2 device > nodes**. > > and: > > V4L2 device node > A device node implementing the **V4L2** interface. Not sure if I answered it already. subdev API is part of V4L2. So, a change like that would cause more harm than good ;-) The definition should let it clear that only the devnodes implemented by the V4L2 main driver are considered as V4L2 device nodes. Regards, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
