On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 09:12:33PM +0000, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 09 Oct 2017, Tom Saeger <tom.saeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 03:26:15PM +0000, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > > I just did something similar, but in python (parallel even). I like > > your version for its elegant simplicity. > > Thanks. I didn't see yours. I'm fine either way although I do like > simplicity. > I didn't send it. I think having a check like you did should reduce the chances for future errors. > > I do however have a series of doc ref fixes ready to send out. They are > > fairly fine-grained but could easily be squashed down. > > > > Given that you added this check - do you also have a patch for fixes? > > None. I checked that my corner of the kernel is fine, and sent this as a > carrot for others to bite. Please go ahead with your fixes! > > Thanks, > Jani. Ok - I'm squashing a few down and will send a series shortly. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > --Tom > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
