On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Harsh Jain <harshjain.prof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Harsh Jain <harshjain.prof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> HI Gilad, >>> >>> I think we need an update in ESP also. Now EBUSY return means driver >>> has accepted, Packet should not be dropped in >>> >>> esp_output_tail() function. >> >> Good catch. You are right and the same holds true for ah_output() in ah4.c. >> >> But I do wonder, the code there now treats -EBUSY as a special case >> and returns NET_XMIT_DROP >> but if an AEAD or AHASH transformation return some other error, like >> -ENOMEM or -EINVAL shouldn't >> we return NET_XMIT_DROP in that case too? > I think we should not, XMIT_DROP implies drop current packet only, > later on when device is recovered from busy state, Upper layer > protocol(TCP) will re-transmit the packet. It helps in flow control. >> I see. Makes sense. Thanks, Gilad -- Gilad Ben-Yossef Chief Coffee Drinker "If you take a class in large-scale robotics, can you end up in a situation where the homework eats your dog?" -- Jean-Baptiste Queru -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
