On 29-08-17, 08:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 02:53:43PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > + boot_constraints_disable > > + Do not set any boot constraints for devices. > > Shouldn't that be the default? As really, that is what the situation is > today, why force everyone to always enable the disable value? And > enabling a value to disable something is usually a sign of bad naming... I will explain once again how it is getting used and then will do whatever you suggest. - Platforms that don't need boot constraints should not enable the CONFIG in the first place. Though we use the same kernel image on multiple hardware types many times. - If a platform doesn't have a platform-specific driver that adds constraints at boot, then the boot constraint core wouldn't get into picture at all and it is as good as being disabled. - And the above boot-argument (boot_constraints_disable) is used ONLY in the case where the platform driver is adding boot constraints at runtime. So, the boot-constraints are disabled by default for everyone even if the configuration is enabled. And that's why I named it the way it is right now. Do you still feel that it needs to be renamed? -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
