On 26/08/17 13:53, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > As both vdev-centric and MC-centric devices may implement the > same APIs, we need a flag to allow userspace to distinguish > between them. > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/open.rst | 7 +++++++ > Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-querycap.rst | 5 +++++ > Documentation/media/videodev2.h.rst.exceptions | 1 + > include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h | 2 ++ > 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/open.rst b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/open.rst > index 64b1de047b1b..d0930fc170f0 100644 > --- a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/open.rst > +++ b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/open.rst > @@ -46,6 +46,13 @@ the periferal can be used. For such devices, the sub-devices' configuration > can be controlled via the :ref:`sub-device API <subdev>`, which creates one > device node per sub-device. > > +.. attention:: > + > + Devices that require **mc-centric** hardware peripheral control should MC-centric As mentioned in my review of a previous patch I dislike the term "peripheral". I think it should be dropped here. > + report a ``V4L2_MC_CENTRIC`` :c:type:`v4l2_capability` flag > + (see :ref:`VIDIOC_QUERYCAP`). > + > + > In summary, for **MC-centric** hardware peripheral control: > > - The **V4L2 device** node is responsible for controlling the streaming > diff --git a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-querycap.rst b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-querycap.rst > index 12e0d9a63cd8..2b08723375bc 100644 > --- a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-querycap.rst > +++ b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-querycap.rst > @@ -252,6 +252,11 @@ specification the ioctl returns an ``EINVAL`` error code. > * - ``V4L2_CAP_TOUCH`` > - 0x10000000 > - This is a touch device. > + * - ``V4L2_MC_CENTRIC`` > + - 0x20000000 > + - Indicates that the device require **mc-centric** hardware MC-centric > + control, and thus can't be used by **v4l2-centric** applications. vdev-centric TBD: I still think I prefer V4L2-centric over vdev-centric. > + See :ref:`v4l2_hardware_control` for more details. > * - ``V4L2_CAP_DEVICE_CAPS`` > - 0x80000000 > - The driver fills the ``device_caps`` field. This capability can > diff --git a/Documentation/media/videodev2.h.rst.exceptions b/Documentation/media/videodev2.h.rst.exceptions > index a5cb0a8686ac..b51a575f9f75 100644 > --- a/Documentation/media/videodev2.h.rst.exceptions > +++ b/Documentation/media/videodev2.h.rst.exceptions > @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ replace define V4L2_CAP_META_CAPTURE device-capabilities > replace define V4L2_CAP_READWRITE device-capabilities > replace define V4L2_CAP_ASYNCIO device-capabilities > replace define V4L2_CAP_STREAMING device-capabilities > +replace define V4L2_CAP_MC_CENTRIC device-capabilities > replace define V4L2_CAP_DEVICE_CAPS device-capabilities > replace define V4L2_CAP_TOUCH device-capabilities > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h b/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h > index 45cf7359822c..7b490fe97980 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h > @@ -460,6 +460,8 @@ struct v4l2_capability { > > #define V4L2_CAP_TOUCH 0x10000000 /* Is a touch device */ > > +#define V4L2_CAP_MC_CENTRIC 0x20000000 /* Device require mc-centric hardware control */ requires MC-centric > + > #define V4L2_CAP_DEVICE_CAPS 0x80000000 /* sets device capabilities field */ > > /* > Regards, Hans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html