Hi Rafael, great work, helps me and the world saving fossil fuels ;) > Am 20.08.2017 um 18:05 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > > Reorganize the power management part of admin-guide by adding a > description of major power management strategies supported by the > kernel (system-wide and working-state power management) to it and > dividing the rest of the material into the system-wide PM and > working-state PM chapters. > > On top of that, add a description of system sleep states to the > system-wide PM chapter. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/admin-guide/pm/index.rst | 5 > Documentation/admin-guide/pm/sleep-states.rst | 234 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Documentation/admin-guide/pm/strategies.rst | 52 +++++ > Documentation/admin-guide/pm/system-wide.rst | 15 + > Documentation/admin-guide/pm/working-state.rst | 16 + > 5 files changed, 320 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-pm/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/index.rst > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/index.rst > +++ linux-pm/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/index.rst > @@ -5,8 +5,9 @@ Power Management > .. toctree:: > :maxdepth: 2 > > - cpufreq > - intel_pstate > + strategies > + system-wide > + working-state > > .. only:: subproject and html BTW: lets drop this C&P 'only' block here. Subprojects are only where a Documentation/*/conf.py exists. The build does not have sub-sub-projects at Documentation/*/*/conf.py level. > Index: linux-pm/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/sleep-states.rst > =================================================================== > --- /dev/null > +++ linux-pm/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/sleep-states.rst > @@ -0,0 +1,234 @@ > +=================== > +System Sleep States > +=================== > + > +:: > + > + Copyright (c) 2017 Intel Corp., Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > + > +Sleep states are global low-power states of the entire system in which user > +space code cannot be executed and the overall system activity is significantly > +reduced. > + > + > + [...] > Index: linux-pm/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/system-wide.rst > =================================================================== > --- /dev/null > +++ linux-pm/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/system-wide.rst > @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ > +============================ > +System-Wide Power Management > +============================ > + > +.. toctree:: > + :maxdepth: 2 > + > + sleep-states > + > +.. only:: subproject and html > + > + Indices > + ======= > + > + * :ref:`genindex` Same here, lets drop the 'only' block. > Index: linux-pm/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/working-state.rst > =================================================================== > --- /dev/null > +++ linux-pm/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/working-state.rst > @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ > +============================== > +Working-State Power Management > +============================== > + > +.. toctree:: > + :maxdepth: 2 > + > + cpufreq > + intel_pstate > + > +.. only:: subproject and html > + > + Indices > + ======= > + > + * :ref:`genindex` Same here, lets drop the 'only' block. > Index: linux-pm/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/strategies.rst > =================================================================== > --- /dev/null > +++ linux-pm/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/strategies.rst > @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ > +=========================== > +Power Management Strategies > +=========================== > + > +:: > + > + Copyright (c) 2017 Intel Corp., Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > + > +The Linux kernel supports two major high-level power management strategies. > + > +One of them is based on using global low-power states of the whole system in > +which user space code cannot be executed and the overall system activity is > +significantly reduced, referred to as :doc:`sleep states <sleep-states>`. The > +kernel puts the system into one of these states when requested by user space > +and the system stays in it until a special signal is received from one of > +designated devices, triggering a transition to the ``working state`` in which > +user space code can run. Because sleep states are global and the whole system > +is affected by the state changes, this strategy is referred to as the > +:doc:`system-wide power management <system-wide>`. I really appreciate your hyper-ref markup using :doc:`Foo <foo>` and `Bar`_ it is very clear when reading the raw text files in the source tree. I think this has its value, but it also has its drawbacks when chapters are renamed or moved from one file to another. Thats, why I recommend using explicitly anchors / may be the maintainer Jon can give us his assessment. What I mean:: .. _foo: Foo === lorem see :ref:`bar` .. _bar: Bar === ipsum see :ref:`foo` With explicitly anchors: - there is no need to track when a chapter is renamed - or moved to another file, - same to renaming files - with intersphinx [1] other projects can link to such anchors [1] http://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/stable/ext/intersphinx.html > + > +The other strategy, referred to as the > +:doc:`working-state power management <working-state>`, Even if you use :ref: or :doc: both are line-break-safe ... +The other strategy, referred to as the :doc:`working-state power +management <working-state>`, ... .. should work. Thanks! -- Markus ---- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
