Re: [v5 2/4] mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/15/2017 10:15 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote:
Generally, oom_score_adj should have a meaning only on a cgroup level,
so extending it to the system level doesn't sound as a good idea.

But wasn't the original purpose of oom_score (and oom_score_adj) to work on a system level, aka "normal" OOM? Is there some peculiarity about memcg OOM that I'm missing?

--
Aleksa Sarai
Software Engineer (Containers)
SUSE Linux GmbH
https://www.cyphar.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux