Le Tue, 1 Aug 2017 19:27:03 +0200, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > I'm surprised they didn't allow for slave clock stretching when > > communicating with a legacy i2c device, it will prohibit use of a rather > > large class of devices. :( > > Yes, but I3C is push/pull IIRC. It is. > > > As for interrupts you are always free to wire up an out-of-band > > interrupt like before. :) > > Yes, my wording was a bit too strong. It is possible, sure. Yet, I > understood that one of the features of I3C is to have in-band interrupt > support. We will see if the demand for backward compatibility or "saving > pins" is higher. > Indeed, you can use in-band interrupts if your device is able to generate them, but that doesn't prevent I3C device designers from using an external pin to signal interrupts if they prefer. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html