> > I agree this is the least invasive and also the most compatible > > approach. The other solution would probably be to have some kind of > > emulation layer? > > Could you detail a bit more what you mean by "emulation layer"? Not really. That was more a extremly high level approach of what theoretically could be possible. When I try to think about details, it gets pretty invasive. > > Since the spec is not public, details about the protocol will be > > especially useful, I'd say. > > Okay, I'll see what I can do. Thanks.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
