On 07/25/2017 08:55 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 08:17:26AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote: >> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c >> index fc47863f629c..26cf6cadd267 100644 >> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c >> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c >> @@ -1202,8 +1202,40 @@ static inline void boot_delay_msec(int level) >> } >> #endif >> >> -static bool printk_time = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME); >> -module_param_named(time, printk_time, bool, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR); >> +static int printk_time = CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME; > > You could just use unsigned int but is the reason you went with int to > enable backward compatibility with the old bool =y or =n? Yes, I wanted to preserve backwards compatibility. P. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
