Hi Catalin, On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 06:12:22PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > Hi Yury, > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 02:26:24PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote: [...] > > This is the 4.12 and linux-next - based kernel patches: > > https://github.com/norov/linux/tree/ilp32-4.12 > > https://github.com/norov/linux/tree/ilp32-20170724 > > Thanks. I'll publish the 4.12-based branch sometime next week. > > At this stage I don't see much value in a linux-next based ILP32. I > would rather like to see a 4.13-rc3 based one, in preparation for a 4.13 > branch once released. > > > Should I resend kernel patches to LKML, or links above are enough for > > you? > > The 4.12 link is ok. However, could you please post a 4.13-rcX based > series, maybe split in two so that a few generic patches can be merged > in 4.14? This is the 4.13-rc3 - based branch: https://github.com/norov/linux/tree/ilp32-4.13-rc3 Patches prior to 52315bc30f4967 ("arm64: ilp32: add documentation on the ILP32 ABI for ARM64") are looking like generic. Note that this series includes the patch "ptrace: Add compat PTRACE_{G,S}ETSIGMASK handlers": https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9817343/ It is still under discussion in maillist. If it will be rejected, we'd rework arm64 ptrace accordingly. > Given the reworking of the sigcontext code in 4.13, it would be > good to review the ILP32 changes in this area again. Thanks, I forgot to mention it in previous email. Changes are mostly located in patches d87e8ed73d59 ("arm64: signal: share lp64 signal structures and routines to ilp32") and 99c30e5df3f4 ("arm64: ilp32: introduce ilp32-specific handlers for sigframe and ucontext"). All reviews are appreciated. Yury -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
