On 07/24/2017 12:59 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > The kerneldoc comment for kthread_create() had an incorrect argument name, > leading to a warning in the docs build. Correct it, and make one more > small step toward a warning-free build. > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> > --- > include/linux/kthread.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/kthread.h b/include/linux/kthread.h > index 4fec8b775895..82e197eeac91 100644 > --- a/include/linux/kthread.h > +++ b/include/linux/kthread.h > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ struct task_struct *kthread_create_on_node(int (*threadfn)(void *data), > * @threadfn: the function to run in the thread > * @data: data pointer for @threadfn() > * @namefmt: printf-style format string for the thread name > - * @...: arguments for @namefmt. > + * @arg...: arguments for @namefmt. > * Hm, Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst says: If a function parameter is ``...`` (varargs), it should be listed in kernel-doc notation as: ``@...:``. but the patch here is for a macro, not a function. Does that make a difference? > * This macro will create a kthread on the current node, leaving it in > * the stopped state. This is just a helper for kthread_create_on_node(); > -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
