I was reading the memory barries documentation in order to make sure the
RISC-V barries were correct, and I found a broken link to the atomic
operations documentation.
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index 732f10ea382e..f1c9eaa45a57 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -498,11 +498,11 @@ And a couple of implicit varieties:
This means that ACQUIRE acts as a minimal "acquire" operation and
RELEASE acts as a minimal "release" operation.
-A subset of the atomic operations described in atomic_ops.txt have ACQUIRE
-and RELEASE variants in addition to fully-ordered and relaxed (no barrier
-semantics) definitions. For compound atomics performing both a load and a
-store, ACQUIRE semantics apply only to the load and RELEASE semantics apply
-only to the store portion of the operation.
+A subset of the atomic operations described in core-api/atomic_ops.rst have
+ACQUIRE and RELEASE variants in addition to fully-ordered and relaxed (no
+barrier semantics) definitions. For compound atomics performing both a load
+and a store, ACQUIRE semantics apply only to the load and RELEASE semantics
+apply only to the store portion of the operation.
Memory barriers are only required where there's a possibility of interaction
between two CPUs or between a CPU and a device. If it can be guaranteed that
--
2.13.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
