On 2017/6/22 22:32, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, root wrote:
@@ -962,6 +962,7 @@ __visible void __irq_entry smp_apic_timer_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
* interrupt lock, which is the WrongThing (tm) to do.
*/
entering_ack_irq();
+ check_poll();
No way, that we sprinkle this function into every interrupt hotpath. There
are enough genuine ways to do that w/o touching a gazillion of files.
I will find a more correct place to call this function.
#ifdef CONFIG_HYPERVISOR_GUEST
+static unsigned int grow_poll_ns(unsigned int old, unsigned int grow,
+ unsigned int max)
+{
+ unsigned int val;
+
+ /* 10us as base poll duration */
+ if (old == 0 && grow)
+ return 10000;
+
+ val = old * grow;
+ if (val > max)
+ val = max;
+
+ return val;
+}
+
+static unsigned int shrink_poll_ns(unsigned int old, unsigned int shrink)
+{
+ if (shrink == 0)
+ return 0;
+
+ return old / shrink;
+}
+
+void check_poll(void)
+{
+ unsigned int val, poll_duration;
+ unsigned long begin_ns, now_ns;
+
+ if (!poll_threshold_ns)
+ return;
If at all then this needs to be a static key based decision.
Sure, will do it.
+
+ begin_ns = this_cpu_read(poll_begin_ns);
+ /* Not from halt state */
+ if (!begin_ns)
+ return;
If you integrate this stuff into the proper place, then the whole mess goes
away. We really do not need another facility to track idle state. We have
enough already, really.
Agree, I will check current code to find a more proper way to do the check.
Thanks,
tglx
--
Yang
Alibaba Cloud Computing
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
