Re: [PATCH v6 25/34] swiotlb: Add warnings for use of bounce buffers with SME

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/15/2017 4:08 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:49:02PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
I guess I don't need the sme_active() check since the second part of the
if statement can only ever be true if SME is active (since mask is
unsigned).

... and you can define sme_me_mask as an u64 directly (it is that already,
practically, as we don't do SME on 32-bit) and then get rid of the cast.

Let me look into that. There are so many places that are expecting an
unsigned long I'll have to see how that all works out from a build
perspective.

Thanks,
Tom


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux