On Thu, 18 May 2017 14:32:57 -0400 Ayan Shafqat <ayan.x.shafqat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > --- > Documentation/process/coding-style.rst | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst b/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst > index d20d52a4d812..a20b44a40ec4 100644 > --- a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst > +++ b/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst > @@ -980,8 +980,8 @@ do so, though, and doing so unnecessarily can limit optimization. > > When writing a single inline assembly statement containing multiple > instructions, put each instruction on a separate line in a separate quoted > -string, and end each string except the last with \n\t to properly indent the > -next instruction in the assembly output: > +string, and end each string except the last with ``\n\t`` to properly indent > +the next instruction in the assembly output: > > .. code-block:: c > I've (finally) applied this, thanks. Note, however, that your patch lacked both a proper changelog and a Signed-off-by line. It's small enough that I was willing to accept it without that, but I added some changelog text myself. Thanks, jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
