On 25/03/17 18:23, Leo Yan wrote:
Coresight includes debug module and usually the module connects with CPU
debug logic. ARMv8 architecture reference manual (ARM DDI 0487A.k) has
description for related info in "Part H: External Debug".
Chapter H7 "The Sample-based Profiling Extension" introduces several
sampling registers, e.g. we can check program counter value with
combined CPU exception level, secure state, etc. So this is helpful for
analysis CPU lockup scenarios, e.g. if one CPU has run into infinite
loop with IRQ disabled. In this case the CPU cannot switch context and
handle any interrupt (including IPIs), as the result it cannot handle
SMP call for stack dump.
This patch is to enable coresight debug module, so firstly this driver
is to bind apb clock for debug module and this is to ensure the debug
module can be accessed from program or external debugger. And the driver
uses sample-based registers for debug purpose, e.g. when system triggers
panic, the driver will dump program counter and combined context
registers (EDCIDSR, EDVIDSR); by parsing context registers so can
quickly get to know CPU secure state, exception level, etc.
Some of the debug module registers are located in CPU power domain, so
this requires the CPU power domain stays on when access related debug
registers, but the power management for CPU power domain is quite
dependent on SoC integration for power management. For the platforms
which with sane power controller implementations, this driver follows
the method to set EDPRCR to try to pull the CPU out of low power state
and then set 'no power down request' bit so the CPU has no chance to
lose power.
If the SoC has not followed up this design well for power management
controller, the driver introduces module parameter "idle_constraint".
Setting this parameter for latency requirement in microseconds, finally
we can constrain all or partial idle states to ensure the CPU power
domain is enabled, this is a backup method to access coresight CPU
debug component safely.
Leo,
Thanks a lot for the quick rework. I don't fully understand (yet!) why we need the
idle_constraint. I will leave it for Sudeep to comment on it, as he is the expert
in that area. Some minor comments below.
Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig | 11 +
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c | 704 ++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 716 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig
index 130cb21..18d7931 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Kconfig
@@ -89,4 +89,15 @@ config CORESIGHT_STM
logging useful software events or data coming from various entities
in the system, possibly running different OSs
+config CORESIGHT_CPU_DEBUG
+ tristate "CoreSight CPU Debug driver"
+ depends on ARM || ARM64
+ depends on DEBUG_FS
+ help
+ This driver provides support for coresight debugging module. This
+ is primarily used to dump sample-based profiling registers when
+ system triggers panic, the driver will parse context registers so
+ can quickly get to know program counter (PC), secure state,
+ exception level, etc.
May be we should mention/warn the user about the possible caveats of using
this feature to help him make a better decision ? And / Or we should add a documentation
for it. We have collected some real good information over the discussions and
it is a good idea to capture it somewhere.
+
endif
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile
index af480d9..433d590 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/Makefile
@@ -16,3 +16,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_SOURCE_ETM4X) += coresight-etm4x.o \
coresight-etm4x-sysfs.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_QCOM_REPLICATOR) += coresight-replicator-qcom.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_STM) += coresight-stm.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_CPU_DEBUG) += coresight-cpu-debug.o
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fbec1d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c
+#define EDPCSR 0x0A0
+#define EDCIDSR 0x0A4
+#define EDVIDSR 0x0A8
+#define EDPCSR_HI 0x0AC
+#define EDOSLAR 0x300
+#define EDPRCR 0x310
+#define EDPRSR 0x314
+#define EDDEVID1 0xFC4
+#define EDDEVID 0xFC8
+
+#define EDPCSR_PROHIBITED 0xFFFFFFFF
+
+/* bits definition for EDPCSR */
+#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
We don't need this to protect the defintions, see comments around adjust_pc method.
+#define EDPCSR_THUMB BIT(0)
+#define EDPCSR_ARM_INST_MASK GENMASK(31, 2)
+#define EDPCSR_THUMB_INST_MASK GENMASK(31, 1)
+#endif
+
+/* bits definition for EDPRCR */
+#define EDPRCR_COREPURQ BIT(3)
+#define EDPRCR_CORENPDRQ BIT(0)
+
+/* bits definition for EDPRSR */
+#define EDPRSR_DLK BIT(6)
+#define EDPRSR_PU BIT(0)
+
+/* bits definition for EDVIDSR */
+#define EDVIDSR_NS BIT(31)
+#define EDVIDSR_E2 BIT(30)
+#define EDVIDSR_E3 BIT(29)
+#define EDVIDSR_HV BIT(28)
+#define EDVIDSR_VMID GENMASK(7, 0)
+
+/*
+ * bits definition for EDDEVID1:PSCROffset
+ *
+ * NOTE: armv8 and armv7 have different definition for the register,
+ * so consolidate the bits definition as below:
+ *
+ * 0b0000 - Sample offset applies based on the instruction state, we
+ * rely on EDDEVID to check if EDPCSR is implemented or not
+ * 0b0001 - No offset applies.
+ * 0b0010 - No offset applies, but do not use in AArch32 mode
+ *
+ */
+#define EDDEVID1_PCSR_OFFSET_MASK GENMASK(3, 0)
+#define EDDEVID1_PCSR_OFFSET_INS_SET (0x0)
+#define EDDEVID1_PCSR_NO_OFFSET_DIS_AARCH32 (0x2)
+
+/* bits definition for EDDEVID */
+#define EDDEVID_PCSAMPLE_MODE GENMASK(3, 0)
+#define EDDEVID_IMPL_NONE (0x0)
+#define EDDEVID_IMPL_EDPCSR (0x1)
+#define EDDEVID_IMPL_EDPCSR_EDCIDSR (0x2)
+#define EDDEVID_IMPL_FULL (0x3)
+
+#define DEBUG_WAIT_TIMEOUT 32
+
+struct debug_drvdata {
+ void __iomem *base;
+ struct device *dev;
+ int cpu;
+
+ bool edpcsr_present;
+ bool edcidsr_present;
+ bool edvidsr_present;
+ bool pc_has_offset;
+
+ u32 eddevid;
+ u32 eddevid1;
We don't need those two registers once we initialise the bool flags above.
So, we could as well drop them from here.
+
+ u32 edpcsr;
+ u32 edpcsr_hi;
+ u32 edprcr;
Unused member ?
+ u32 edprsr;
+ u32 edvidsr;
+ u32 edcidsr;
+};
+
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(debug_lock);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct debug_drvdata *, debug_drvdata);
+static int debug_count;
+static struct dentry *debug_debugfs_dir;
+
+static struct pm_qos_request debug_qos_req;
+static int idle_constraint = PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE;
+module_param(idle_constraint, int, 0600);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(idle_constraint, "Latency requirement in microseconds for CPU "
+ "idle states (default is -1, which means have no limiation "
+ "to CPU idle states; 0 means disabling all idle states; user "
+ "can choose other platform dependent values so can disable "
+ "specific idle states for the platform)");
Correct me if I am wrong,
All we want to do is disable the CPUIdle explicitly if the user knows that this
could be a problem to use CPU debug on his platform. So, in effect, we should
only be using idle_constraint = 0 or -1.
In which case, we could make it easier for the user to tell us, either
0 - Don't do anything with CPUIdle (default)
1 - Disable CPUIdle for me as I know the platform has issues with CPU debug and CPUidle.
than explaining the miscrosecond latency etc and make the appropriate calls underneath.
something like (not necessarily the same name) :
module_param(broken_with_cpuidle, bool, 0600);
MODULE_PARAM_DESC(broken_with_cpuidle, "Specifies whether the CPU debug has issues with CPUIdle on"
" the platform. Non-zero value implies CPUIdle has to be"
" explicitly disabled.",);
+
+static bool debug_enable;
+module_param_named(enable, debug_enable, bool, 0600);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "Knob to enable debug functionality "
+ "(default is 0, which means is disabled by default)");
+static void debug_force_cpu_powered_up(struct debug_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+ int timeout = DEBUG_WAIT_TIMEOUT;
+
+ drvdata->edprsr = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + EDPRSR);
+
+ CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
+
+ /* Bail out if CPU is powered up yet */
+ if (drvdata->edprsr & EDPRSR_PU)
+ goto out_powered_up;
+
+ /*
+ * Send request to power management controller and assert
+ * DBGPWRUPREQ signal; if power management controller has
+ * sane implementation, it should enable CPU power domain
+ * in case CPU is in low power state.
+ */
+ drvdata->edprsr = readl(drvdata->base + EDPRCR);
+ drvdata->edprsr |= EDPRCR_COREPURQ;
You seem to be overloading the edprsr member here with EDPRCR by mistake.
Since we don't need a cached value of EDPRCR, you might as well use a local
variable here.
+ writel(drvdata->edprsr, drvdata->base + EDPRCR);
+
+ /* Wait for CPU to be powered up (timeout~=32ms) */
+ while (timeout--) {
+ drvdata->edprsr = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + EDPRSR);
+ if (drvdata->edprsr & EDPRSR_PU)
+ break;
+
+ usleep_range(1000, 2000);
+ }
We have coresight_timeout() already, but not in a reusable shape (regarding
the timeout). We could possibly reuse it in the future.
+
+ /*
+ * Unfortunately the CPU cannot be powered up, so return
+ * back and later has no permission to access other
+ * registers. For this case, should set 'idle_constraint'
+ * to ensure CPU power domain is enabled!
+ */
+ if (!(drvdata->edprsr & EDPRSR_PU)) {
+ pr_err("%s: power up request for CPU%d failed\n",
+ __func__, drvdata->cpu);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+out_powered_up:
+ debug_os_unlock(drvdata);
Question: Do we need a matching debug_os_lock() once we are done ?
+
+ /*
+ * At this point the CPU is powered up, so set the no powerdown
+ * request bit so we don't lose power and emulate power down.
+ */
+ drvdata->edprsr = readl(drvdata->base + EDPRCR);
+ drvdata->edprsr |= EDPRCR_COREPURQ | EDPRCR_CORENPDRQ;
+ writel(drvdata->edprsr, drvdata->base + EDPRCR);
+
+out:
+ CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
+}
+
+static void debug_read_regs(struct debug_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+ /*
+ * Ensure CPU power domain is enabled to let registers
+ * are accessiable.
+ */
+ debug_force_cpu_powered_up(drvdata);
+
+ if (!debug_access_permitted(drvdata))
+ return;
+
+ CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
+
+ debug_os_unlock(drvdata);
+
+ drvdata->edpcsr = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + EDPCSR);
+
+ /*
+ * As described in ARM DDI 0487A.k, if the processing
+ * element (PE) is in debug state, or sample-based
+ * profiling is prohibited, EDPCSR reads as 0xFFFFFFFF;
+ * EDCIDSR, EDVIDSR and EDPCSR_HI registers also become
+ * UNKNOWN state. So directly bail out for this case.
+ */
+ if (drvdata->edpcsr == EDPCSR_PROHIBITED)
+ goto out;
+
+ /*
+ * A read of the EDPCSR normally has the side-effect of
+ * indirectly writing to EDCIDSR, EDVIDSR and EDPCSR_HI;
+ * at this point it's safe to read value from them.
+ */
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT))
+ drvdata->edpcsr_hi = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + EDPCSR_HI);
+
+ if (drvdata->edcidsr_present)
+ drvdata->edcidsr = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + EDCIDSR);
+
+ if (drvdata->edvidsr_present)
+ drvdata->edvidsr = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + EDVIDSR);
+
+out:
+ CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
+}
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
Instead of using this #ifndef/ifdef check twice (here and in the caller), we could :
+static unsigned long debug_adjust_pc(struct debug_drvdata *drvdata,
+ unsigned long pc)
+{
+ unsigned long arm_inst_offset = 0, thumb_inst_offset = 0;
+
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT))
return drvdata->edpcsr_hi << 32 | drvdata->edpcsr;
+ if (drvdata->pc_has_offset) {
+ arm_inst_offset = 8;
+ thumb_inst_offset = 4;
+ }
+
+ /* Handle thumb instruction */
+ if (pc & EDPCSR_THUMB) {
+ pc = (pc & EDPCSR_THUMB_INST_MASK) - thumb_inst_offset;
+ return pc;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Handle arm instruction offset, if the arm instruction
+ * is not 4 byte alignment then it's possible the case
+ * for implementation defined; keep original value for this
+ * case and print info for notice.
+ */
+ if (pc & BIT(1))
+ pr_emerg("Instruction offset is implementation defined\n");
+ else
+ pc = (pc & EDPCSR_ARM_INST_MASK) - arm_inst_offset;
+
+ return pc;
+}
+#endif
+
+static void debug_dump_regs(struct debug_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+ unsigned long pc;
+
+ pr_emerg("\tEDPRSR: %08x (Power:%s DLK:%s)\n", drvdata->edprsr,
+ drvdata->edprsr & EDPRSR_PU ? "On" : "Off",
+ drvdata->edprsr & EDPRSR_DLK ? "Lock" : "Unlock");
+
+ if (!debug_access_permitted(drvdata)) {
+ pr_emerg("No permission to access debug registers!\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (drvdata->edpcsr == EDPCSR_PROHIBITED) {
+ pr_emerg("CPU is in Debug state or profiling is prohibited!\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
+ pc = (unsigned long)drvdata->edpcsr_hi << 32 |
+ (unsigned long)drvdata->edpcsr;
+#else
+ pc = debug_adjust_pc(drvdata, (unsigned long)drvdata->edpcsr);
+#endif
nit: see above, comment for debug_adjust_pc().
+
+ pr_emerg("\tEDPCSR: [<%p>] %pS\n", (void *)pc, (void *)pc);
+
+ if (drvdata->edcidsr_present)
+ pr_emerg("\tEDCIDSR: %08x\n", drvdata->edcidsr);
+
+ if (drvdata->edvidsr_present)
+ pr_emerg("\tEDVIDSR: %08x (State:%s Mode:%s Width:%dbits VMID:%x)\n",
+ drvdata->edvidsr,
+ drvdata->edvidsr & EDVIDSR_NS ? "Non-secure" : "Secure",
+ drvdata->edvidsr & EDVIDSR_E3 ? "EL3" :
+ (drvdata->edvidsr & EDVIDSR_E2 ? "EL2" : "EL1/0"),
+ drvdata->edvidsr & EDVIDSR_HV ? 64 : 32,
+ drvdata->edvidsr & (u32)EDVIDSR_VMID);
+}
+
+static void debug_init_arch_data(void *info)
+{
+ struct debug_drvdata *drvdata = info;
+ u32 mode, pcsr_offset;
+
+ CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
+
+ debug_os_unlock(drvdata);
+
+ /* Read device info */
+ drvdata->eddevid = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + EDDEVID);
+ drvdata->eddevid1 = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + EDDEVID1);
As mentioned above, both of these registers are only need at init time to
figure out the flags we set here. So we could remove them.
+
+ CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
+
+ /* Parse implementation feature */
+ mode = drvdata->eddevid & EDDEVID_PCSAMPLE_MODE;
+ pcsr_offset = drvdata->eddevid1 & EDDEVID1_PCSR_OFFSET_MASK;
+
+ if (mode == EDDEVID_IMPL_NONE) {
+ drvdata->edpcsr_present = false;
+ drvdata->edcidsr_present = false;
+ drvdata->edvidsr_present = false;
+ } else if (mode == EDDEVID_IMPL_EDPCSR) {
+ drvdata->edpcsr_present = true;
+ drvdata->edcidsr_present = false;
+ drvdata->edvidsr_present = false;
+ } else if (mode == EDDEVID_IMPL_EDPCSR_EDCIDSR) {
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) &&
+ (pcsr_offset == EDDEVID1_PCSR_NO_OFFSET_DIS_AARCH32))
+ drvdata->edpcsr_present = false;
+ else
+ drvdata->edpcsr_present = true;
Sorry, I forgot why we do this check only in this mode. Shouldn't this be
common to all modes (of course which implies PCSR is present) ?
+
+ drvdata->edcidsr_present = true;
+ drvdata->edvidsr_present = false;
+ } else if (mode == EDDEVID_IMPL_FULL) {
+ drvdata->edpcsr_present = true;
+ drvdata->edcidsr_present = true;
+ drvdata->edvidsr_present = true;
+ }
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT))
+ drvdata->pc_has_offset = false;
+ else
+ drvdata->pc_has_offset =
+ (pcsr_offset == EDDEVID1_PCSR_OFFSET_INS_SET);
+
nit: This if-else chain could be replaced by :
drvdata->edpcsr_present = false;
drvdata->edcidsr_present = false;
drvdata->edvidsr_present = false;
switch(mode) {
case EDDEVID_IMPL_FULL:
drvdata->edvidsr_present = true;
/* Fall through */
case EDDEVID_IMPL_EDPCSR_EDCIDSR:
drvdata->edcidsr_present = true;
/* Fall through */
case EDDEVID_IMPL_EDPCSR:
/*
* In ARM DDI 0487A.k, the EDDEVID1.PCSROffset is used to
* define if has the offset for PC sampling value; if read
* back EDDEVID1.PCSROffset == 0x2, then this means the debug
* module does not sample the instruction set state when
* armv8 CPU in AArch32 state.
*/
drvdata->edpcsr_present = (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) ||
(pcsr_offset != EDDEVID1_PCSR_NO_OFFSET_DIS_AARCH32));
drvdata->pc_has_offset = (pcsr_offset == EDDEVID1_PCSR_OFFSET_INS_SET);
default:
break;
}
+ return;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Dump out information on panic.
+ */
+static int debug_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *self,
+ unsigned long v, void *p)
+{
+ int cpu;
+ struct debug_drvdata *drvdata;
+
+ pr_emerg("ARM external debug module:\n");
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
Shouldn't this be for_each_online_cpu() ? If the user has turned off a CPU,
we shouldn't try to dump its registers.
+ drvdata = per_cpu(debug_drvdata, cpu);
+ if (!drvdata)
+ continue;
+
+ pr_emerg("CPU[%d]:\n", drvdata->cpu);
+
+ debug_read_regs(drvdata);
+ debug_dump_regs(drvdata);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct notifier_block debug_notifier = {
+ .notifier_call = debug_notifier_call,
+};
+
+static int debug_enable_func(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
I think we should request the power domain here, now that the user
has explicitly requested the feature to be turned on and released
in debug_disable_func().
+ pm_qos_add_request(&debug_qos_req,
+ PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY, idle_constraint);
+
+ ret = atomic_notifier_chain_register(&panic_notifier_list,
+ &debug_notifier);
...
+ if (ret)
+ goto err;
+
+ return 0;
+
+err:
+ pm_qos_remove_request(&debug_qos_req);
+ return ret;
nit : this could be :
if (ret)
pm_qos_remove_request(&debug_qos_req);
return ret;
+}
+
+static void debug_disable_func(void)
+{
As noted above, we could drop the power domain here.
+ atomic_notifier_chain_unregister(&panic_notifier_list,
+ &debug_notifier);
+ pm_qos_remove_request(&debug_qos_req);
+}
+
+static ssize_t debug_func_knob_write(struct file *f,
+ const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+ if (on) {
+ ret = debug_enable_func();
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("%s: unable to disable debug function: %d\n",
+ __func__, ret);
+ goto err;
+ }
+ } else
+ debug_disable_func();
As per Linux codingstyle rules, you should use {} for the else section.
See Documentation/process/coding-style.rst: Section 3.
+static ssize_t debug_idle_constraint_write(struct file *f,
+ const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+ int val;
+ ssize_t ret;
+
+ ret = kstrtoint_from_user(buf, count, 10, &val);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&debug_lock);
+ idle_constraint = val;
+
+ if (debug_enable)
+ pm_qos_update_request(&debug_qos_req, idle_constraint);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&debug_lock);
+ return count;
+}
+
+static ssize_t debug_idle_constraint_read(struct file *f,
+ char __user *ubuf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+ char buf[32];
+ int len;
+
+ if (*ppos)
+ return 0;
It would be better if we do :
+
+ len = sprintf(buf, "%d\n", idle_constraint);
if (*ppos > len)
return 0;
+ return simple_read_from_buffer(ubuf, count, ppos, buf, len);
return simple_read_from_buffer(ubuf, count, ppos, buf + *ppos, len - *ppos);
+
+static int debug_func_init(void)
+{
+ struct dentry *file;
+ int ret;
...
+ /* Enable debug module at boot time */
+ ret = debug_enable_func();
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("%s: unable to disable debug function: %d\n",
s/disable/enable ?
+ __func__, ret);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+
+err:
+ debugfs_remove_recursive(debug_debugfs_dir);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void debug_func_exit(void)
+{
+ debugfs_remove_recursive(debug_debugfs_dir);
+
+ /* Disable functionality if has enabled */
+ if (debug_enable)
+ debug_disable_func();
+}
+
+static int debug_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
+{
+ void __iomem *base;
+ struct device *dev = &adev->dev;
+ struct debug_drvdata *drvdata;
+ struct resource *res = &adev->res;
+ struct device_node *np = adev->dev.of_node;
+ int ret;
+
+ drvdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*drvdata), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!drvdata)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ drvdata->cpu = np ? of_coresight_get_cpu(np) : 0;
+ if (per_cpu(debug_drvdata, drvdata->cpu)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "CPU's drvdata has been initialized\n");
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ drvdata->dev = &adev->dev;
+ amba_set_drvdata(adev, drvdata);
+
+ /* Validity for the resource is already checked by the AMBA core */
+ base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
+ if (IS_ERR(base))
+ return PTR_ERR(base);
+
+ drvdata->base = base;
+
+ get_online_cpus();
+ per_cpu(debug_drvdata, drvdata->cpu) = drvdata;
+ ret = smp_call_function_single(drvdata->cpu,
+ debug_init_arch_data, drvdata, 1);
+ put_online_cpus();
Now that we have dynamic enable/disable of the feature, we should do a pm_runtime_put()
as expected and try to get_ the power domain when we enable the debug.
Suzuki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
