Re: [PATCH v5 untested] kvm: better MWAIT emulation for guests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Mar 21, 2017, at 9:58 AM, Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In '-smp 2', the writing VCPU always does 10000 wakeups by writing into
> monitored memory, but the mwaiting VCPU can be also woken up by host
> interrupts, which might add a few exits depending on timing.
> 
> I didn't spend much time in making the PASS/FAIL mean much, or ensuring
> that we only get 10000 wakeups ... it is nothing to be worried about.
> 
> Hint 240 behaves as nop even on my system, so I still don't find
> anything insane on that machine (if OS X is exluded) ...

>From my days in Intel (10 years ago), I can say that MWAIT wakes for many
microarchitecural events beside interrupts.

Out of curiosity, aren’t you worried that on OS X the wbinvd causes an exit
after the monitor and before the mwait?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux