On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 09:22:35PM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > Really, in any situation where there's a cdev and a device in the same > structure, the life cycles of the two become linked but their reference > counts are not and that is the problem here. Yes, the cdev must hold a kref on the containing struct otherwise userspace can trigger a use after free. This cannot be fixed with an approach inside the open/release function either as the cdev core code itself relies on the memory to exist. I've suggested something like this before: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/8/1066 So I hope this will make it in, it is a step in the right direction. If it does, would you make another patch to go further? I think cdev_init should take enough arguments to hold the enclosing kref, API wise there should be no API to init a cdev without the caller specifying the enclosing struct's kref. That is the only way we will stamp this bug-class out. Eg look at kernel/time/posix-clock.c, it is wrong in the same way as well - the kref_put in posix_clock_release is not enough to make it work, clk->cdev is referenced after posix_clock_release returns by the cdev core so this has a use-after-free. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
