Am 25.01.2017 um 21:59 schrieb Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>: >> But the problem I see here is, that the perl script generates a >> reST output which I can't use. As an example we can take a look at >> the man-page builder I shipped in the series. > > Sorry, I still don't understand *why* you can't use the same rst. Your > explanation seems to relate to man pages, but man pages come > *afterwards*, and are a separate improvement. I know you talk about lack > of proper structure and all that, but *why* can it strictly not be used, > if the *current* rst clearly can be used? "afterwards" is the word, that lets me slowly realize, that I have to stop solving the world's problems with one patch. Now I guess how my next patch series has to look like. Thanks! ... for being patient with me. Before I start, I want to hear your thoughts about the parsing aspect ... >>> That said, perhaps having an elegant parser (perhaps based on a compiler >>> plugin) is incompatible with the idea of making it a bug-for-bug drop-in >>> replacement of the old one, and it's something we need to think about. Did you have any suggestions? -- Markus -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
