Am 25.01.2017 um 09:21 schrieb Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>: > Yes, see below. It's simplistic and it has an external dependency, but > it got the job done. And it does not depend on Sphinx; it's just a > kernel-doc and rst lint, not Sphinx lint. Whether that's a good or a bad > thing is debatable. > > Anyway, I do think the approach of making 'make CHECK=the-tool C=1' work > is what we should aim at. Ah, cool ... didn't know C=1 before .. I will consider it in v2. > Markus' patch could probably be made to do > that by accepting the same arguments that are passed to compilers. Is this what you mean? make W=n [targets] Enable extra gcc checks, n=1,2,3 where 1: warnings which may be relevant and do not occur too often 2: warnings which occur quite often but may still be relevant 3: more obscure warnings, can most likely be ignored Multiple levels can be combined with W=12 or W=123 Thanks! --Markus-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
